TEENAGERS AND SEXUALITY 'CONSENT
Abstract
Mr. Paola Terzoni , Ancona Forum
[...] The theme of the assistance given me today, deserves wider socio-cultural considerations, given that even the point of view of the law is developed their observation of the changing reality, then drops to legislate or otherwise regulate new phenomena keeping pace with the changing needs of the times. [...] Until recently, more than a century ago, the consideration of the cultural peculiarities of childhood and adolescence was minimal and only after a long and difficult process of social, family issues arise that are also right: the concept of Jemolo, that the family is an island that only has the right lap, we come, little by little, the conviction of the need for greater legal categories of interference in family relationships. In this context, the first need is to emerge is to limit the ability of the child in the only area in which it can produce damage, that is where he contracted obligations. [...] Sexuality was a concept found in the negative, was not recognized as an individual right, but it was referred to and which falls in all the events contrary to morality as indicated by art. 21 of the Constitution. At the time sexuality was the bed, with a view, however, male-only to pay to the canons of morality, - remember that the female adultery was not in fact considered more offense in '68-'69, with the rulings of the Constitutional Court -.[...] Then the divorce law of 70, moving the age of 18 years leading to the epochal reform of family law which arise in the '75 final figure of the woman and the child, independently from 'institution of marriage ... that absorb them.
By the Editors of the site
Shyness Clinic
0 comments:
Post a Comment